| |
![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Scarlett Mod ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
| |
| |
| | #12 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| It is in the Cosmo magazine. The one with Fergie on the cover. The first part is from the writer. Jessica wants to play a lesbian. Her actual quote is "I want to play someone with completely different sexual orientation." The title right before that one sentence is Jessica Alba is straight, she's dating Cash Warren. Then theres a small pic and then the quote. Its in an article called "30 things I found out this week in Hollywood" not word for word that title, but you get the picture. |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
|
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
Good thing you wrote that second sentence because I would have been all over that. cheers | |
| | #16 (permalink) |
|
Posts: n/a
| I told you guys before, for her to get noticed by the Oscar party crowd, she's going to have to play an alternative or screwed up character at some point. She recognizes that and has it in her plans, which is smart. I wouldn't place any bets on there being any sex or nudity in a role like this if she chooses one, if that's your bag that is. The character will be a "real" gay person just like they pushed in BM to continue to prove to us everybody and anybody could be gay and we need to fight the stereotypes again (sigh). I think she's going that route solely to prove herself and finally get some acting cred from those snobby critics out there that control these things. It sucks she has to do it, but it's smart on her part to manipulate the game this way. Rook takes pawn, check I say (and no, I have never understood chess but it sounds good, don't it?)! |
| | #18 (permalink) | |
|
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
I'm not into "word of mouth" so to speak. I'd rather see it for myself, or a source. But thats just me. | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Apparently, you did see the article first hand. I'm still trying to find that article to satisfy those who are looking for a source. If I can't find it, then see for yourself in the issue. Also, it's at one's own discretion to believe whatever they hear, see, read, etc. Last edited by yanjonm : 07-23-2006 at 07:07 PM. |
| |
![]() |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM.






