Bblluurr

07-25-2004, 02:54 AM

Seriously, I don't know why people take the pictures and then decide not to show them as they are.

Can anyone tell me why? Or where to get the un-altered one? [img]graemlins/upside.gif[/img]

[ July 25, 2004, 01:55 AM: Message edited by: ://Death by Talk Show ]

07-25-2004, 03:16 AM

Yeah, I hate all of the photoshopped pics that airbrush an already airbrushed image.

I think part of it is because often there's text over part of the picture, and scanners have to clone it out.

07-25-2004, 04:36 AM

Agree with u, guys.
And the hq version of this pic will be soon at jessicaalba.ca

social_misfit · 07-25-2004, 09:35 AM

How 'bout this: LegsLegsLegs!

07-25-2004, 09:44 AM

What's altered about it? The color? I guess I haven't seen the original one but all I've ever seen around is this same picture...

07-25-2004, 11:59 AM

[ July 25, 2004, 11:00 AM: Message edited by: Super_Creature ]

07-25-2004, 12:34 PM

continue legs topic

[ July 25, 2004, 11:44 AM: Message edited by: Super_Creature ]

social_misfit · 07-25-2004, 03:18 PM

Here's another from the same photoshoot: LegsLegsLegs2!

07-25-2004, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Flyin11:
What's altered about it? The color? I guess I haven't seen the original one but all I've ever seen around is this same picture...

You seriuosly don't see the blur in between her legs? [img]graemlins/eek.gif[/img]

07-25-2004, 10:11 PM

lol its kinda obvious

07-26-2004, 08:36 AM

I don't know much about touch ups, but as a proffessional photographer, I have to say that with certain lighting, things look different, for example, the shading in between her legs is also along her face and neck...maybe it was just the light quality etc and bad ISO film?

07-26-2004, 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ://Death by Talk Show:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Flyin11:
What's altered about it? The color? I guess I haven't seen the original one but all I've ever seen around is this same picture...

You seriuosly don't see the blur in between her legs? [img]graemlins/eek.gif[/img] </font>[/QUOTE]Seriously..No..It just looks like she has her legs crossed...nothing unusual [img]graemlins/eek.gif[/img]

07-26-2004, 03:13 PM

I don't know, but to me it looks altered:

Or it could just be the lighting.

07-27-2004, 04:10 PM

its most likley altered slightly..they often do touch ups to photo's to make the celebrities look better.. like smoother skin..ussually only in photo's for magazines, but its not unlikley that they wouldnt do it for just any photo..

Metal Head · 07-27-2004, 08:53 PM

its camra quality thats why it blurred in some spots

07-27-2004, 09:13 PM

it looks more blurred when seen from a distance, looks like the blur tool from photoshop..

how did u guys come about such close details about this photo anyways? [img]graemlins/ohwell.gif[/img]

07-25-2004, 02:54 AM	#1 (permalink)
Avis Phlox Guest Posts: n/a	Seriously, I don't know why people take the pictures and then decide not to show them as they are. Can anyone tell me why? Or where to get the un-altered one? [img]graemlins/upside.gif[/img] [ July 25, 2004, 01:55 AM: Message edited by: ://Death by Talk Show ]

07-25-2004, 03:16 AM	#2 (permalink)
CDR Guest Posts: n/a	Yeah, I hate all of the photoshopped pics that airbrush an already airbrushed image. I think part of it is because often there's text over part of the picture, and scanners have to clone it out.

07-25-2004, 04:36 AM	#3 (permalink)
stereo Guest Posts: n/a	Agree with u, guys. And the hq version of this pic will be soon at jessicaalba.ca

07-25-2004, 09:35 AM	#4 (permalink)
social_misfit Swedish chef Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 706 My Profile	How 'bout this: LegsLegsLegs!

07-25-2004, 09:44 AM	#5 (permalink)
Flyin11 Guest Posts: n/a	What's altered about it? The color? I guess I haven't seen the original one but all I've ever seen around is this same picture...

07-25-2004, 11:59 AM	#6 (permalink)
Super_Creature Guest Posts: n/a	[ July 25, 2004, 11:00 AM: Message edited by: Super_Creature ]

07-25-2004, 12:34 PM	#7 (permalink)
Super_Creature Guest Posts: n/a	continue legs topic [ July 25, 2004, 11:44 AM: Message edited by: Super_Creature ]

07-25-2004, 03:18 PM	#8 (permalink)
social_misfit Swedish chef Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 706 My Profile	Here's another from the same photoshoot: LegsLegsLegs2!

07-25-2004, 10:11 PM	#10 (permalink)
Jess2k4 Guest Posts: n/a	lol its kinda obvious

07-26-2004, 08:36 AM	#11 (permalink)
Malakai Guest Posts: n/a	I don't know much about touch ups, but as a proffessional photographer, I have to say that with certain lighting, things look different, for example, the shading in between her legs is also along her face and neck...maybe it was just the light quality etc and bad ISO film?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

07-26-2004, 03:13 PM	#13 (permalink)
Avis Phlox Guest Posts: n/a	I don't know, but to me it looks altered: Or it could just be the lighting.

07-27-2004, 04:10 PM	#14 (permalink)
Nagika Guest Posts: n/a	its most likley altered slightly..they often do touch ups to photo's to make the celebrities look better.. like smoother skin..ussually only in photo's for magazines, but its not unlikley that they wouldnt do it for just any photo..

07-27-2004, 08:53 PM	#15 (permalink)
Metal Head Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: CA Posts: 156 My Profile	its camra quality thats why it blurred in some spots

07-27-2004, 09:13 PM	#16 (permalink)
Jess2k4 Guest Posts: n/a	it looks more blurred when seen from a distance, looks like the blur tool from photoshop.. how did u guys come about such close details about this photo anyways? [img]graemlins/ohwell.gif[/img]