Marie Clarie 2005 - 2 Pics + 2 Page Article

[RebelMan]

The Interview Confirms there were Naughty Pics on the Lost Camera but she says she Deleted them before it became Lost.

<font size=10>DAMN!!!!!!</font>

[img]graemlins/flame.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/flame.gif[/img]

Well at least she is Smarter than all the Other Celebs that had something like this happen to them.
[img]graemlins/thumbs.gif[/img]

[@lbaholic]

Originally posted by rebelman20:
The Interview Confirms there were Naughty Pics on the Lost Camera but she says she Deleted them before it became Lost.

Well they can be retreived if she didn't take any pictures to take their place on the card.

I'm working on it right now [img]graemlins/sly.gif[/img]
No, seriously I wouldn't do that, and I also hope they don't show up.

[ July 03, 2005, 12:33 AM: Message edited by: @lbaholic ]

[RebelMan]

Originally posted by @lbaholic:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by rebelman20:
The Interview Confirms there were Naughty Pics on the Lost Camera but she says she Deleted them before it became Lost.

Well they can be retreived if she didn't take any pictures to take their place on the card.

I'm working on it right now [img]graemlins/sly.gif[/img]
No, seriously I wouldn't do that, and I also hope they don't show up. </font>[/quote]I agree don't show them now if they do show up, but later down the road.

Do you think that if this pics do show up, it will destroy Jessica's reputation completely!??

And everybody will talk about it and call her **** of something...

I am absolutly sure that in a few, this pics will be put on each porn site and it will harm to her image anyways ...

of something...

I mean "or something"

..."Not that naughty", she says with a laugh....

To me that statement implies that they were not dirty or pornographic or anything like that.

They were naughty but not THAT naughty.
Not Paris Hilton naughty.

She would not be lauging about it if they where.

Read more carefully next time

Thats how rumers get started


[img]graemlins/boggled.gif[/img]

[BlackWolf]

nice scans Rebel

I guess it looks like she likes to tease us...

first , those GQ pics, where she's lieing completely nude on the bed, after that those MTV pics which put everybody upside down...

Guys! Dont you think she decided to show her perfect body to keeping us more attracted...

If she didnt want this naughty photos do show up she woudnt told about them in magazine...

Correct me if i am mistaken, but i think so...

[rh71]

Originally posted by $RuSS$:
If she didnt want this naughty photos do show up she woudnt told about them in magazine...

Correct me if i am mistaken, but i think so...

I originally thought this too, but if you read the whole article, she makes mention of them because she noticed that the reporter had the same digital camera. She mentions in passing that she lost hers and it goes on from there about the "well, not that naughty" pictures that were on them. It's a tease, but it was good for substance for the article but not to promote herself or a movie. She could've played it out much more if that were the case. And it's not like she brought it up out of nowhere.

I agree. It's not like she brought it up from nowhare. But keyword is DELETED!

Well here is my opinion: she actually lost the camera and she didnt want this... but she uses this case to attract us... she wants to have a little scandal climate around her... it's always usefull, and after all the pictures are "not so naughty"

But I paid attention to another words "Cash and I took a two-and-a-half hour bath the other day" [img]graemlins/wacked.gif[/img]

I almost hate him after that words...))