| |
 |
| ||||||||||||||||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
02-15-2004, 07:53 PM
| #6 (permalink) |
| .  |  Beauties dude thanks. I'm with you on that motor boat... ooops wait I don't mean on the same motor boat. [img]graemlins/upside.gif[/img] I'm not sure where HQ draws the line either? High quality may be in the eye of the looker? Some HQ's are off-the-charts giants. And others may only be slightly bigger than your screen? I think they become HQ if they are not grainy? Just my guess. |
|  |
|
02-15-2004, 09:58 PM
| #8 (permalink) |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Great pics, but I just have to ask. What's with the horrible .jpg compression lately? Why not do a .png compression or something? It's lossless and still has small file sizes. Don't get me wrong, I love the fact that you are constantly posting fabulous photos of her, but there is no way that these can be considered HQ. Large yes, HQ no. Just my $0.02 |
| |
|
02-15-2004, 10:27 PM
| #9 (permalink) |
| . | You're right but they are HQ compared to the regular size that run around the net. Most of the digital sites that offer these images for sale want your firstborn child for true high resolution. They want true compensation. Some don't offer high resolution no matter what the price. So the ones that float around the web tend to be the small resolution. Another problem is some folks play around with resizing and attempting to enlarge an image. This generally screws up an image big time. Another problem is people post them via poor hosts and the resolution decays further. If you look around at any posted image very very few are more than 100kb. There's an size limitation for the Fanhost host too. |
|
| |
|
02-15-2004, 11:08 PM
| #11 (permalink) | |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
| |
| |
|
02-15-2004, 11:31 PM
| #13 (permalink) |
| . | I'm sure none of you mean harm. Is something better than nothing? Think about it eh? There is an alternative. Go pay some of those sites for their so-called HQ pix. Then you will see the difference between free and wallet draining pix. All the photos can't be perfect all the time. These are by far much better than low resolution pix. I can only speak for myself. I'm grateful for any pix. I don't have the money to buy all the HQ's out there. Hell I don't have the money to afford ONE HQ pic at their typical prices. |
|
| |
|
02-15-2004, 11:36 PM
| #14 (permalink) |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
|  no wonder people like don leave.. Mo and others post pics and then a few of you ***** about the quality damn how about we are lucky to get these pics? just what we need to have all our good pic to leave geeez [ February 15, 2004, 09:40 PM: Message edited by: T-Bone ] |
| |
|
02-15-2004, 11:43 PM
| #15 (permalink) |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| I would agree there. People who don't have to post something aren't likely to enjoy when people complain about something that they wouldn't have had otherwise, that's a lesson people here should know by now. Mo can keep and enjoy all these pics for himself if he wanted to, instead he spends the time to post them for other people to enjoy. Mo is going to post what he has, if the quality isn't good enough for ones taste then don't save the pic, it really isn't that big of a deal. Too often people take those who spend the time to contribute for granted until they aren't there anymore. [ February 15, 2004, 09:44 PM: Message edited by: TC Visitor ] |
| |
|
02-15-2004, 11:51 PM
| #16 (permalink) | |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
| |
| |
|
02-16-2004, 12:36 AM
| #17 (permalink) |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Heh, I'm never asking another freakin' question on this board. ;) I can tell when pics are high quality but I just didn't know the criteria or if there is any other than appearance. If you blow up any pic enough it's going to lose some quality and be grainy. I have to disagree that these aren't high quality, just don't zoom in as much and you will see how clear her face is. [ February 15, 2004, 11:02 PM: Message edited by: Dolphan ] |
| |
|
02-16-2004, 05:15 AM
| #18 (permalink) |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Wow! some people just can't take a comment. [img]graemlins/woah.gif[/img] I wasn't complaining. I appreciate very much the work done by this community. [img]graemlins/thumbs.gif[/img] I can't talk for Lady Croft but geez is it that bad to point out a flaw that may have not been noticed on Mo's or other posters' computers? The goal here was to help out by bettering ourselves not destroy each other! Believe me, a board this great would be the last place I'd like to pick a fight. I'm terribly sorry if I offended anyone. [img]graemlins/uhoh.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/boggled.gif[/img] |
| |
|
02-16-2004, 05:35 AM
| #19 (permalink) |
| . | I sincerely doubt anyone is offended. Mo has been sharing his photos for years. He's quite aware of resolution and the tricks of the trade. Very adept. Don't worry he knows exactly what he's doing. He's posted THOUSANDS (I believe even tens of thousands) of images over the years. Criticism and or comments can quickly be confused. People who take the time to share needn't be reminded of the quality do they? I don't think so anyway (though I may be tempted at times to lament over a poor scan when the image is HOT ;) ) No one is jumping down anyone's throat here. Now if you were at a pay site you would have every right to mention quality or value. But these are freebies man. I'm sure you or Lady Croft meant no harm as I mentioned before. It began as a very very innocent question regarding the term HQ. The mole hill became a confused mountain. And as TC mentioned, simply avoid right-click-save. It really is no big deal. [ February 16, 2004, 03:40 AM: Message edited by: i love love ] |
|
| |
|
02-16-2004, 07:25 AM
| #20 (permalink) |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Dunno why I didn't do this before opening my big mouth :confused: (silly me) but here's my attempt at correcting that first picture: http://upload.mindless-innovation.co...4_HQ_MS1_X.jpg Enjoy! |
| |
|
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:23 AM.
