| |
![]() |
| ||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #21 (permalink) | ||
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | The dashboard looks the same - except that it's greyish instead of black. Furthermore I do have a radio with cassette, none with CD. My steering wheel looks different, as it has an Airbag. (airbags for driver and front passenger have been part of the basic configuration). This one is simlilar to my interieur (http://www.driveandtravel.de/tests/t_099_01.jpg), only that the beige part is grey in my car. Quote:
1.6 R4 8V 55kW/75 Hp 1.6 R4 16V 74 kW/100 Hp 1.8 R4 16V 85 kW/115 Hp 2.0 R4 16V 100 kW/136 Hp 2.5 V6 24V 125 kW/170 Hp 1.7 R4 8V DT 60 kW/82 Hp After the facelift in 1999, a new engine was introduced 2.2 R4 16V 108 kW/147 Hp and the 1.6 V8 was no longer offered. Other changes apart from modifications to the chassis was that the only cars with rims equal or larger 15" have been sold (14" earlier). Also the basis version now got disk brakes instead of drum brakes for the read wheels. Quote:
And I like the engine, as it has a broad usable speed range. I drove the 1.6 16V a couple of times and it seems to be even weaker in the lower speed range from 800 upto 2000rpm, although it's more powerful on the paper.Here's more info http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opel_Vectra If you don't understand German, just look at the pictures. Last edited by Samson The Cat : 02-18-2007 at 09:07 PM. | ||
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| Gear Heads Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | The main difference between our cars is that you have an Opel and I have a GM. Yeah ... your car has some details that I haven't in mine. Mainly the air conditioner. Opel has digital and my GM has analogical. The digital ones had just arrived in 1999/2000 models. Same as the airbags. Only in the top lines we have airbags here in Brazil. About the engine, my GM Vectra has a 2.0 8v with 116 horsepower. I think is good for the Vectra, but could be more. Vectra is a heavy car. The other options here is: 2.0 16v with 123Hp 2.2 8v with 132Hp and 2.2 16v with 141Hp. I want this one! ![]() |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
Last edited by Samson The Cat : 02-20-2007 at 08:55 AM. | |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Cannot live without Love ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Heh, the phone is not mine (I'm the guy in the second pic). It's a Motorola, maybe has good resolution but is still far away from "real" cameras (just look at the other pics in this thread). My Corsa is one of the latest third-generation ones. When I buyed it (six months ago), fourth-generation was starting to sell: ![]() That's the reason I choose it. When old generations are selling off, they have good discounts. ![]() |
| | |
![]() |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:04 PM.






And I like the engine, as it has a broad usable speed range. I drove the 1.6 16V a couple of times and it seems to be even weaker in the lower speed range from 800 upto 2000rpm, although it's more powerful on the paper.






















