Quote:
Originally Posted by eadweard  WE practice civility and politeness here. Please read the entire conversation. TRY to understand what is being discussed: if Sarah wore a dress that was airbrushed out and her skin was photoshopped , then we are not seeing Vaseline's effects; we are looking at a fake. That would be a fraud. Get it, yet? I have also, at least twice before in this forum, stated that I do NOT believe that is the case: Sarah herself has stated she did pose nude for this campaign. TRY, try to read ALL before going off half-cocked with a virulent tone. Oh, and welcome to the forum...I think. |
Oh please, don't get offended just because I don't agree with anything you've said. I obviously wasn't being hostile and it's sort of petty of you to pull that card, really. Talk about civility, you're being awfully disrespectful. I completely understand the argument and I think it's completely delusive.
Whether or not she actually posed nude is not the issue I was responding to. The suggestion that
if she didn't, then she's a fraud, is what I was replying to. I don't really care whether or not you think she actually posed nude. I think the argument that it's false advertising is completely moot considering everything is airbrushed and photoshopped. She even mentioned the photoshopping on Rachael Ray so yeah, she is photoshopped in that picture and there's a possibility that she isn't completely nude. There are other celebrities who posed for the campaign that weren't completely nude either. Their nudity isn't at all important to the campaign so whether or not she's or anyone else is actually nude shouldn't be such a huge issue.
I used to mod here, so I know how it works, thanks.