I don't think he would be glad to see everything we post here, just because we talk about his private life, and we post pics about his privacy (when he's shopping, it's his privacy). Because he doesn't seem to be a vain person who likes everybody talking and seing everything he does.
When we say "if they are on the net, it's ok, we can post them" : well, let's be clear, if nobody said that, gossips wouldn't exist. Gossips are gossips above all because they are widespread. And they are widespread because fans (like us) exist, in order to satisfy us and our will to know everything about our favourite celebrities. Eveything means also and maybe above all, their privacy. But it doesn't prevent us from feeling guilty sometimes.
And of course, Josh mustn't appreciate that. And meanwhile, yeah, that's a part of celebrity (unfortunately for him).
But, we are human beings and we are fans. And good fans I think, because we wonder about that (thanks Annie for that!).
We are not journalists who have to select what is gossip and what is real information. It's a fan forum, not even a forum specialised in Cinéma (artistically speaking), so, should we really stop posting candids ? I'm nt sure. But we could select candids (as we did for Heath Ledger service). |