View Single Post
Old 09-28-2006, 10:24 AM   #6 (permalink)
SultanOfSix
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 627
Send a message via AIM to SultanOfSix
Default

There's a difference between being comfortable with your body, and exposing it. The former almost always necessitates the latter, but nothing in the world says that the latter will follow from the former.

I disagree with your opinion on her "no nudity" stance. I don't know if she's made it explicit, but she's certainly implied that nudity in the movies is exploitative of women. This notion of the "scene called for it" is completely superficial, and if you look into this rationalization, it's full of holes. There are three times that one is required to be nude or partially nude in real life: using the bathroom, taking a bath, and performing sexual relations. None of which require that the naked human body be exposed because all scenes that display the latter three types of actions can be implied very easily.

But, if she's changed her stance to get more work, that is completely asinine. There's a famous actress who never did any nude scene to become who she is, and she's considered one of the greatest actresses on the planet: Julia Roberts.

As far as T.O. is concerned, his media *****ship is a creation of the media itself. T.O. has been partially responsible for the attention, but the fact that the media overemphasizes every aspect of his life, shows that they are becoming more and more responsible for his prostitution. They are his pimp, and they proved their agenda as well as their stupidity yesterday with their own circus creation.

The police report was leaked by someone on the force. Hence, the term "police report". It's been done before by the Dallas police force, like it was done many years ago in the rape allegation charges against Michael Irvin and Erik Williams which were subsequently dropped.
SultanOfSix is offline